Latest Comments

20000_1
AHA, SGUJ looks a little dirty now ;-D
Posted by Siddhartha Ganesh on 2007 Sep 21 05:43:01 +0100
P1030507
Lovely picture. Yes, the paint job is certainly very good. The lack of quality in the Indian-built locos is because of the "cost-cutting" exercise. What the officials do not realize is to cut the cost now is to pay handsomely later.
Posted by M S M Saifullah on 2007 Sep 17 03:08:18 +0100
P1030507
Wonderful loco and wonderful photo! Now a days lots of WDG-4s are visiting Panvel.
Posted by Ranjeet Ramaswamy Iyer on 2007 Sep 16 13:39:59 +0100
wdp4_20031_mandovi_exp_ratnigiri.jpg
Excellent framing and composition. Drama allround.....great shot!
Posted by Siddhartha Ganesh on 2007 Aug 28 15:04:57 +0100
wdp4_20031_mandovi_exp_ratnigiri.jpg
What an intimidating scene! Now for the rest of the series..;-)
Posted by Abhijit Lokre on 2007 Aug 28 13:23:27 +0100
20042
20042 is almost a regular link the the udyan. Hav been seeing this loco since 2 months now at pune
Posted by Swaran Udasi on 2007 Aug 17 08:54:44 +0100
P1020393
From some angle(neglect the traction) it resembles CSDR. I'm saying w.r.t WDG-4
Posted by Ranjeet Ramaswamy Iyer on 2007 Aug 07 17:12:44 +0100
P1020393
Awesome image.
Posted by Samar on 2007 Aug 06 20:13:09 +0100
P1020393
Great picture once again!
Posted by Siddhartha Ganesh on 2007 Aug 06 17:38:57 +0100
IMG 1
My guess is that the BOXNs in question are not empty. I think there are iron ore movements from somewhere up from Kulem (forget the name of the place) that go over the ghats and these BOXNs are laden with that. Such wagons look like they are empty since the weight of the ore does not allow complete filling of the wagons. That may be the case they are covered though I really don't think it makes much of a difference where iron ore is concerned. And for all that I've said, these may well be some other dense material. The other BOXN seems to be laden with coal since that will permit piled-high loading. Great snap anyway!
Posted by Gautam on 2007 Aug 01 20:30:17 +0100