Latest Comments
| |
|
Very Beautiful... Posted by Vijay Aravamudhan on 2012 Feb 06 13:53:06 +0000 |
|
No Sir, some modifications on the track signalling was being done, i.e. linking of the rest of the section on the ATFC network Posted by Vijay Aravamudhan on 2012 Feb 06 13:49:33 +0000 |
|
Hi Amit, You are right!! My apologies. This is 19116 Bhuj - BDTS. The next pic taken by me in the sequence shows the details. The coach had marking of 19116/19132 written, which caused the confusion. Is there a rake sharing between Kutch and Sayaji nagri? Posted by Giridhar Patnaik on 2012 Feb 06 13:39:37 +0000 |
|
Hope they never have to use this again. Posted by Dr.Jitendra Mulky on 2012 Feb 06 13:36:17 +0000 |
|
I think that the LP was following the old process !! Will take some time to switch over to the new procedures. Posted by S. Srinivas on 2012 Feb 06 13:25:59 +0000 |
|
|
Was any special work required to be done under the neutral zone ?? Posted by S. Srinivas on 2012 Feb 06 13:15:34 +0000 |
|
With short hood forward, more side platers enjoyed the ride !! Posted by S. Srinivas on 2012 Feb 06 13:13:15 +0000 |
|
|
Thanks Aditya, this coverage has been done by Mumbai railfans from Central Railway, Western Railway and Harbour line. Posted by Arzan Kotval on 2012 Feb 06 12:49:20 +0000 |
|
And the King left late because of the false bomb hoax. Posted by Dr.Jitendra Mulky on 2012 Feb 06 12:36:11 +0000 |
Perfectly said Amit... DC EMU looks like a decorated bride....
Posted by Vijay Aravamudhan on 2012 Feb 06 13:56:14 +0000