Latest Comments
| |
|
|
Jagan MohanWhich shed were these locos from? Ratlam? Posted by Guest on 2004 Feb 04 21:28:24 +0000 |
|
NitinThe article merely states the way things were with this train in 1982. Posted by Guest on 2004 Feb 01 21:58:09 +0000 |
|
Jimmy joseDear Nitin, great stuff indeed. Do you have more of these railway related paper clippings? Shanker!!! this is defenitely heading for your classic trains page Posted by Guest on 2004 Jan 31 00:42:43 +0000 |
|
|
NeilA historic narrative. Great work, Nitin! Sadly, the Punjab Mail seems to have lost all its gloss now. Posted by Guest on 2004 Jan 30 15:08:35 +0000 |
|
|
NitinYes, this is the newspaper cutting from the Times and the date of this article was the 20th June 1982. Posted by Guest on 2004 Jan 30 03:18:41 +0000 |
|
RanganathGood find. Posted by Guest on 2004 Jan 24 09:29:29 +0000 |
|
AlokTrue. Not too windy around here. The 'pan' over the road is indeed meant to catch any falling chunks of coal from the carriages. Posted by Guest on 2004 Jan 20 19:40:23 +0000 |
|
Jagan MohanThats bureaucracy for you; people do things without even knowing what the hell they are doing. In this case someone was probably told to get a photo of a loco and he/she went and got the first one that they could. Interestingly, the rake behind the WAG-1 looks like a passenger rake. I suppose we should be grateful they didn't post a pic of a WAP-5 hauled LHB Rajdhani in a freight ad. Posted by Guest on 2004 Jan 19 11:24:30 +0000 |
|
SukiIs it not a sign indicating a special joint found in the Long/Continuous Welded (LWR/CWR) Rail segments? Posted by Guest on 2004 Jan 19 02:23:04 +0000 |
Nitin
Yep, Ratlam it is.
Posted by Guest on 2004 Feb 05 00:43:54 +0000