Latest Comments
| |
|
Sandeep BhateAll these formations, typically, have one or two empty flat bed wagons between the loaded wagons and the WDSs, any idea why? - Sandeep Bhate. Posted by Guest on 2004 Mar 09 04:18:16 +0000 |
|
Sandeep BhateToo good Vikas, the sleepers seem to be very closely placed, are they really? - Sandeep Bhate. Posted by Guest on 2004 Mar 09 04:10:49 +0000 |
|
Sandeep BhateJust a wiiiild guess, seem to be 56??? wagons and 3 / 4?? locos - Sandeep Bhate. Posted by Guest on 2004 Mar 09 04:07:09 +0000 |
|
|
Sandeep BhateThanks for all these great pics Vikas. This one specially has a too good combination of everything. Did you count the number of wagons? How many locos were in charge? KK line should be given more powerful locos - Sandeep Bhate. Posted by Guest on 2004 Mar 09 04:03:18 +0000 |
|
Sandeep BhateThat's a bad pile up of wagons - Sandeep Bhate. Posted by Guest on 2004 Mar 09 03:59:16 +0000 |
|
Sandeep BhateAgree about the headlight comment. But there seem to be quite a few WAM4s and WAG5s with such older fashioned headlights on this KK line, observe the earlier pics - Sandeep Bhate. Posted by Guest on 2004 Mar 09 03:57:24 +0000 |
|
Sandeep BhateSeems like a unending chain of wagons!! Any idea, how long was this chain? - Sandeep Bhate. Posted by Guest on 2004 Mar 09 03:52:50 +0000 |
|
Sandeep BhateAgree!!! But why is the headlight off? Was it stationary? - Sandeep Bhate. Posted by Guest on 2004 Mar 09 03:49:37 +0000 |
|
Sandeep BhateClassy picture!!!! Witty caption as well!! :) Right Jimmy, worth to be nominated for showcase - Sandeep Bhate. Posted by Guest on 2004 Mar 09 03:38:37 +0000 |
Sandeep Bhate
Any idea why "SCR" as well as "BZA" written on the loco? Also, any idea why is it written "4p/6p"? - Sandeep Bhate.
Posted by Guest on 2004 Mar 09 04:22:05 +0000