Latest Comments
| |
|
Derek/dandspreece@btopenworldSad that progress seems to carry a heavy aesthetic cost. Posted by Guest on 2004 Feb 12 00:59:22 +0000 |
|
brian.dominic@tiscali.co.ukWhat an absolute MESS!!!!!!! I'm SURE that could have been done a whole lot more neatly........ Posted by Guest on 2004 Feb 11 20:01:42 +0000 |
|
Apurva (iti@vsnl.com)Too modern for my tastes. Give me the classic lines of the original B class any day. Just too many gizmos on this loco. Posted by Guest on 2004 Feb 10 18:27:07 +0000 |
|
|
Apurva (iti@vsnl.com)Too modern for my tastes. Give me the classic lines of the original B class any day. Just too many gizmos on this loco. Posted by Guest on 2004 Feb 10 18:26:50 +0000 |
|
|
NeilVery interesting peep-in at what is involved on a loco conversion project. Posted by Guest on 2004 Feb 10 15:08:28 +0000 |
|
|
Jay BI could't find any photos of similar loco in the Hughs NG loco book. But from the notes, this could be the F Class 2-8-2 of Barsi Light Railway(Miraj-Kurdwadi-Latur). Posted by Guest on 2004 Feb 07 19:55:13 +0000 |
|
Sashi/telugu_2002boy@hotmail.com
True, it does look clean!! Posted by Guest on 2004 Jan 27 21:50:43 +0000 |
|
RanganathGr8 Pic Anand. I could not get a similar angle at Madurai for the same fellow. Looks like the 3358 underwent some more cosmetics since I saw it. Posted by Guest on 2004 Jan 21 16:25:29 +0000 |
|
shyamone correction:its not MAS, which means chennai central......it shd be MS, which means chennai egmore Posted by Guest on 2004 Jan 20 17:00:32 +0000 |
shanx
my and bharath moro checked the guage on which it was plinthed. it was an MG loco so i guess it can't be a ZD.
Posted by Guest on 2004 Feb 17 13:37:03 +0000