View Comments

God help us ....
Posted by Gautam on 2007 Oct 17 21:40:00 +0100
As usual, Alok's beaten the gang. I was working my contacts to shoot the interiors of the 84 berthed GR and the 81 berthed SL coaches at MAS. A wonderful set of pics, Alok! Thanks.
Posted by Sridhar Joshi on 2007 Oct 18 05:40:24 +0100
What is wrong with SMB concept? IR is in business to make money and squeeze every inch of space to generate revenue.

Passengers do have an option to opt for AC2 if they do not like SMB.

No frill airlines not only dropped lunch but also reduced pitch (distance between two seats). Skybus, a new airline charges for check in baggage.

So what is wrong in concept? Nothing is free for sure. Instead of paying Rs. 300 for Tatkal, it's cheaper to sleep in SMB.

Please provide valid arguments against it. Thanks.
Posted by Prakash Tendulkar on 2007 Oct 18 06:10:55 +0100
Big Bad Wolf at his sarcastic best!! Thanks for the pics Alok!! I was wondering which Yoga - asana would suit, for me to curl up onto a SMB, if at all I were allocated one!
Posted by PVS Praveen Kumar on 2007 Oct 18 07:09:34 +0100
There is nothing right in the SMB concept per my say. As a passenger who have travelled extensively in both 3A/SL through my life, I would say that passengers demand at least some comfort rather than treated as cattle. Vacant berths in Alok's pictures are looking better but just think when the coach will be loaded with 81 passengers plus the unauthorized passengers.

My future comments deferred till I travel on this type of coach.
Posted by Samar on 2007 Oct 18 07:41:34 +0100
Well size matters really! It's easy to say IR is just trying to earn more revenue but if this keeps going on, it's going to lose out some of its passengers. I thought government facilities were kept in mind to provide satisfaction and comfort for the people; this seems as if they want to drive out their passengers ;-)
Posted by Siddhartha Ganesh on 2007 Oct 18 10:34:58 +0100
dear Praveen, it would require a bit of genetic engineering for your next generation to fit in SMB.rgds..
Posted by Aseem Johri on 2007 Oct 18 14:05:17 +0100
Its not about revenues. Apart from the berth, check out the seat that the 'extra' person will occupy. Is it right for folks to pay the same fare to sit in lesser space than the one right opposite them? And what about luggage space for that 'extra' - under the side berths or where the seat is? And for the extra 9 passengers, the number of lavatories remain the same. Its not been long since I last travelled in Sleeper class and I cannot imagine doing it now!
Posted by Gautam on 2007 Oct 18 14:54:45 +0100
Very bad indeed. Its my sincere prayer to God that Pushpak Express should not get SMB till 11th February 2008 ;-)
Posted by Akshay Marathe on 2007 Oct 18 18:02:31 +0100
"Something is always better than nothing ". Nothing wrong if SMB are reserved for RAC only. But it would be awfull if a person who books two months in advance and ends up with a lousy SMB.
Posted by Zubin J Dotivala on 2007 Oct 19 06:04:05 +0100
Yet another Lalu's concepts of Premium Packaged 3A/SL Tin cans @ Discount of 4% from existing Fare!!, Utter Nonsense I say of this Happening, Thanks Alok for helping us get prepared at the ordeal we've gotta face. Colin Peter
Posted by Gallery Administrator on 2007 Oct 19 14:17:42 +0100
Wonderful job Alok! At first I thought photos from some prison cell were put up in the gallery until I realised that it is insight into the future troubles of 3AC travel! Nevertheless, the warm interiors are a welcome change from the standard blue. Somewhat makes up for the lack of comfort!
Posted by Karan Desai on 2007 Oct 20 04:59:33 +0100